Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 295 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

80

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

47

42%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

87
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

51

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

39

38%

LEVEL 4

32

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

27

37%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

34

46%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

19

54%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

80

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

160
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

105

40%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

23

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

28

38%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

77

40%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

73

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

98

39%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.