GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

178

41%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

224

51%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

97

45%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

127

56%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

35

47%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

52

40%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

105

58%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

15

52%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

128

35%

LEVEL 2

151

42%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

164

45%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

50

69%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

60

82%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

164

45%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

205

53%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

177

41%

LEVEL 2

169

40%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

220

52%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

54

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.