Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

449
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

71

10%

LEVEL 2

193

27%

LEVEL 3

302

42%

LEVEL 4

147

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

443
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

76

11%

LEVEL 2

199

28%

LEVEL 3

316

44%

LEVEL 4

127

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

243
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

161

47%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

229
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

148

42%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

141

38%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

214
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

168

46%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

425
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

68

10%

LEVEL 2

184

27%

LEVEL 3

287

42%

LEVEL 4

138

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

414
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

73

11%

LEVEL 2

187

28%

LEVEL 3

302

45%

LEVEL 4

112

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

426
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

143

24%

LEVEL 3

287

48%

LEVEL 4

139

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

162

26%

LEVEL 3

292

47%

LEVEL 4

120

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

445
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

70

10%

LEVEL 2

191

27%

LEVEL 3

301

43%

LEVEL 4

144

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

443
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

75

11%

LEVEL 2

195

27%

LEVEL 3

316

44%

LEVEL 4

127

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

52

44%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

367
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

166

28%

LEVEL 3

250

42%

LEVEL 4

117

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

350
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

259

45%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

426
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

65

10%

LEVEL 2

182

27%

LEVEL 3

285

42%

LEVEL 4

141

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.