BEDFORD STUY COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

63

40%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

113
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

116

40%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

56

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

27

50%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

183
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

43

46%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

119

38%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.