LA CIMA CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

52

31%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.