ICAHN CHARTER SCHOOL 3 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

92

47%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

91

46%

LEVEL 4

70

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

46

47%

LEVEL 4

27

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

54

51%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

46

46%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

33

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

63

50%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

99
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

59

47%

LEVEL 4

40

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

23

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

87

50%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

88

48%

LEVEL 4

68

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

134
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

90

47%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

78

48%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

81

46%

LEVEL 4

59

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

88

47%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.