Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 2 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

37

10%

LEVEL 3

167

45%

LEVEL 4

164

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

52

13%

LEVEL 3

182

46%

LEVEL 4

155

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

88

45%

LEVEL 4

93

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

92

44%

LEVEL 4

96

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

79

45%

LEVEL 4

71

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

90

49%

LEVEL 4

59

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

217
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

10%

LEVEL 3

121

50%

LEVEL 4

96

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

212
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

119

47%

LEVEL 4

93

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

56

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

48

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

135

44%

LEVEL 4

148

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

27

8%

LEVEL 3

145

46%

LEVEL 4

143

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

48
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

32

48%

LEVEL 4

16

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

37

49%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

333
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

51

13%

LEVEL 3

179

46%

LEVEL 4

154

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

29

44%

LEVEL 4

32

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

32

41%

LEVEL 4

37

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

138

45%

LEVEL 4

132

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

268
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

150

48%

LEVEL 4

118

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

306
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

156

45%

LEVEL 4

150

44%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.