Skip to Content
Main content

EQUITY PROJECT CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

111

24%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

179
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

104

23%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

164
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

61

56%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

62

61%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

55

62%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

125

29%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

177
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.