TRUE NORTH TROY PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

16

34%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

113
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

118
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

16

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

29

39%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.