NYC ACADEMY FOR DISCOVERY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

16

22%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

28

29%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

66

44%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.