ACADEMY OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

80

36%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

49

44%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

42

42%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

30

35%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

40

43%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

62
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

65

36%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.