HUNTS POINT SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

150

57%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

143

55%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

59

48%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

53

43%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

91

65%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

90

65%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

36

58%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

29

44%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

113

59%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

112

60%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

88

46%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

62

84%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

55

79%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

103

49%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

47

89%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

50

83%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

141

57%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

130

55%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

116

57%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

102

54%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.