ACHIEVEMENT FIRST APOLLO CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

144

26%

LEVEL 3

241

44%

LEVEL 4

121

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

214

39%

LEVEL 4

139

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

134

47%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

76

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

15

42%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

246
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

165

46%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

220
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

66

40%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

113

24%

LEVEL 3

223

47%

LEVEL 4

116

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

113

23%

LEVEL 3

201

42%

LEVEL 4

133

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

31

43%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

355
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

235

45%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

339
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

127

25%

LEVEL 3

201

39%

LEVEL 4

138

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

21

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

47

42%

LEVEL 4

32

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

310
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

210

44%

LEVEL 4

100

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

274
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

167

38%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

339
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

228

44%

LEVEL 4

111

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.