ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

360
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

136

26%

LEVEL 3

217

41%

LEVEL 4

143

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

139

25%

LEVEL 3

229

41%

LEVEL 4

159

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

81

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

131

43%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

98

41%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

249
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

150

41%

LEVEL 4

99

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

241
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

62

43%

LEVEL 4

38

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

89

49%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

124

24%

LEVEL 3

211

42%

LEVEL 4

141

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

125

23%

LEVEL 3

224

42%

LEVEL 4

158

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

357
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

215

42%

LEVEL 4

142

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

386
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

130

24%

LEVEL 3

227

42%

LEVEL 4

159

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

13

68%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

32

39%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

43

41%

LEVEL 4

33

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

306
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

185

41%

LEVEL 4

121

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

186

41%

LEVEL 4

126

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.