BROWNSVILLE ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

106

16%

LEVEL 2

209

32%

LEVEL 3

232

35%

LEVEL 4

108

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

75

11%

LEVEL 2

202

30%

LEVEL 3

271

40%

LEVEL 4

126

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

127

39%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

299
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

88

16%

LEVEL 2

180

32%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

349
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

69

12%

LEVEL 2

161

28%

LEVEL 3

245

42%

LEVEL 4

104

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

33

44%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

177

31%

LEVEL 3

221

39%

LEVEL 4

108

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

162

28%

LEVEL 3

250

44%

LEVEL 4

123

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

45

51%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

46

44%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

83

17%

LEVEL 2

164

34%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

225

39%

LEVEL 4

105

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

327
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

102

16%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

222

35%

LEVEL 4

105

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.