Skip to Content
Main content

HEBREW LANGUAGE ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

101

24%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

140

33%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

78

34%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

59

30%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

60

40%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

96
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

38

51%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

173
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.