EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

57

48%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

49

37%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

31

46%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

46

64%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

93

44%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.