DR WALTER COOPER ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

129

61%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

130

60%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

53

54%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

41

44%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

76

67%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

89

72%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

97

60%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

98

60%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

25

63%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

75

50%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

65

48%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

54

87%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

65

80%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

118

60%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

120

59%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

120

63%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

121

62%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

124

61%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

121

59%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.