Skip to Content
Main content

GRANT AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

50

67%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

20

49%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

55

34%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.