SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

75

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

130
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

121

36%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

201
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

31

61%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

185
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

25

41%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.