Skip to Content
Main content

CRESTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

139

33%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

132

31%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

23

47%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

124

34%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

47

55%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

89

64%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

78

63%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

121

29%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

98

29%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

104

29%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

41

48%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.