BEDFORD STUY NEW BEGINNINGS CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

76

17%

LEVEL 2

113

25%

LEVEL 3

141

32%

LEVEL 4

116

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

72

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

136
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

115
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

98

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

30

29%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

250
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

95

24%

LEVEL 3

134

33%

LEVEL 4

116

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

104

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

14

24%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.