RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

193

34%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

95

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

82

13%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

210

35%

LEVEL 4

120

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

273
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

186

36%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

306
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

192

39%

LEVEL 4

94

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

197

37%

LEVEL 4

118

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

37

46%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

330
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

193

32%

LEVEL 3

210

35%

LEVEL 4

120

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

46

46%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

294
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

76

14%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

200

36%

LEVEL 4

94

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.