SUCCESS ACAD CHARTER SCHOOL-HARLEM 5 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

51

11%

LEVEL 3

223

47%

LEVEL 4

198

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

413
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

46

10%

LEVEL 3

215

46%

LEVEL 4

198

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

117

46%

LEVEL 4

115

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

113

47%

LEVEL 4

108

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

14%

LEVEL 3

106

48%

LEVEL 4

83

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

102

46%

LEVEL 4

90

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

294
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

159

48%

LEVEL 4

135

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

270
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

144

47%

LEVEL 4

126

41%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

56

46%

LEVEL 4

53

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

116
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

61

48%

LEVEL 4

55

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

172

45%

LEVEL 4

187

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

30

8%

LEVEL 3

181

46%

LEVEL 4

182

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

62
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

51

55%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

34

49%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

415
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

50

11%

LEVEL 3

218

47%

LEVEL 4

197

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

400
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

43

10%

LEVEL 3

204

46%

LEVEL 4

196

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

11

69%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

38

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

36

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

47

12%

LEVEL 3

200

49%

LEVEL 4

160

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

41

10%

LEVEL 3

190

48%

LEVEL 4

162

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

391
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

44

10%

LEVEL 3

208

48%

LEVEL 4

183

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.