BROOKLYN DREAMS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

84

20%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

88

22%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

37

44%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

37

54%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

173
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

22

45%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

27

39%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.