Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

36

9%

LEVEL 3

212

51%

LEVEL 4

166

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

145

49%

LEVEL 4

123

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

104

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

71

49%

LEVEL 4

63

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

123

59%

LEVEL 4

62

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

74

48%

LEVEL 4

60

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

202
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

108

50%

LEVEL 4

94

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

143
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

77

48%

LEVEL 4

66

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

160
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

95

53%

LEVEL 4

65

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

57

45%

LEVEL 4

56

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

30

8%

LEVEL 3

173

48%

LEVEL 4

154

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

120

48%

LEVEL 4

111

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

51
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

39

68%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

25

51%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

371
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

34

8%

LEVEL 3

208

51%

LEVEL 4

163

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

36

49%

LEVEL 4

31

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

22

46%

LEVEL 4

23

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

29

9%

LEVEL 3

176

52%

LEVEL 4

135

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

10%

LEVEL 3

123

49%

LEVEL 4

100

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

359
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

35

9%

LEVEL 3

200

51%

LEVEL 4

159

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

12

60%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.