Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 2 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

5%

LEVEL 3

196

44%

LEVEL 4

225

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

417
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

42

9%

LEVEL 3

219

48%

LEVEL 4

198

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

203
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

87

42%

LEVEL 4

116

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

97

43%

LEVEL 4

113

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

109

46%

LEVEL 4

109

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

29

12%

LEVEL 3

122

51%

LEVEL 4

85

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

268
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

149

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

271
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

133

46%

LEVEL 4

138

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

74

50%

LEVEL 4

66

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

136
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

81

50%

LEVEL 4

55

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

168

43%

LEVEL 4

206

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

7%

LEVEL 3

187

47%

LEVEL 4

181

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

47
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

28

53%

LEVEL 4

19

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

32

48%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

410
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

4%

LEVEL 3

186

43%

LEVEL 4

224

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

407
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

36

8%

LEVEL 3

211

48%

LEVEL 4

196

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

10

67%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

36

43%

LEVEL 4

47

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

33

58%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

338
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

160

44%

LEVEL 4

178

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

365
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

37

9%

LEVEL 3

186

46%

LEVEL 4

179

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

399
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

5%

LEVEL 3

183

43%

LEVEL 4

216

51%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.