ACAD-PERSONAL LDSHP AND EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

193

38%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

216

42%

LEVEL 2

161

31%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

139

49%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

138

50%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

172

39%

LEVEL 2

164

37%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

118
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

192

43%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

134

35%

LEVEL 2

151

39%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

134

35%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

59

51%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

82

63%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

131
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

105

65%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

102

69%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

184

39%

LEVEL 2

182

38%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

201

42%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

182

42%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

35

46%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

34

41%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.