HELEN M MARSHALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

30

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

21

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

51

72%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

57

83%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

137
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

118
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

78

34%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

71

77%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

119

39%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.