Skip to Content
Main content

PS 280 HOME OF THE LIONHEARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

131
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

19

50%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

102

41%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

39

49%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

27

41%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

16

67%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.