ACHIEVEMENT FIRST ASPIRE CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

126

45%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

72

48%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

56

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

54

42%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

97

45%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

116

48%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

88

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

24

48%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

172
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

123

45%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

217
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

32

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

102

46%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

118

46%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.