Skip to Content
Main content

DEMOCRACY PREP ENDURANCE CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

67

43%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

92
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

37

38%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

31

39%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

38

49%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

19

49%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

17

55%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.