LAUNCH EXPEDITIONARY LRNING CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

62

42%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

80

34%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

48

64%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

76

29%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

79

30%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.