ACADEMY OF THE CITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

105

46%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

96

42%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

55

45%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

48

39%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

50

47%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

48

45%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

24

53%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

21

46%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

12

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

55

42%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

54

42%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

98

48%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

90

44%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

98

47%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

131
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

93

43%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

29

53%

LEVEL 4

18

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

23

39%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

76

44%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

73

43%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

99

46%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.