SILAS WOOD 6TH GRADE CENTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

74

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

81

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

43

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

45

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

36

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

36

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

31

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

79

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

81

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

49

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

48

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

37

32%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

81

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.