ROSCOE CONKLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

62

40%

LEVEL 2

69

45%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

77

52%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

27

45%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

24

38%

LEVEL 2

29

46%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

25

46%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

43

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

41

51%

LEVEL 2

34

42%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

44

68%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.