COMMUNITY VOICES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

90

51%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

19

70%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

52

66%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

63

72%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

128

40%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

13

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

18

75%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

84

38%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

40

55%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.