Skip to Content
Main content

FAMILY LIFE ACADEMY CS II GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

121

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

128

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

75

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

161
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

86

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

64
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

28

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

179
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

192
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

97

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

112

40%

LEVEL 4

112

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

122

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

241
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

120

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

258
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

127

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

19

70%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

11

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

14

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

110

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

107

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

14

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.