SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-COBBLE HILL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

94

45%

LEVEL 4

105

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

69

53%

LEVEL 4

60

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

43

42%

LEVEL 4

54

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

34

49%

LEVEL 4

36

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

51

47%

LEVEL 4

51

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

35

57%

LEVEL 4

24

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

28

46%

LEVEL 4

32

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

24

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

30

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

23

64%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

26

40%

LEVEL 4

35

54%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

25

61%

LEVEL 4

15

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

77

43%

LEVEL 4

98

54%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

51

46%

LEVEL 4

58

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

17

59%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

18

86%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

45

40%

LEVEL 4

64

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

36

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

49

51%

LEVEL 4

41

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

44

63%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

187
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

88

45%

LEVEL 4

99

50%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.