EXPLORE EXCEED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

45

53%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

48

52%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.