BRILLA COLLEGE PREP CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

140

45%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

55

43%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

71

46%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

69

44%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

110

47%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

120

50%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

24

37%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

178
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

130

49%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

126

44%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

85

39%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.