Skip to Content
Main content

PS 527 EAST SIDE SCHOOL-SOCIAL ACTIO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

64

43%

LEVEL 4

67

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

89

52%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

31

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

47

56%

LEVEL 4

28

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

44

48%

LEVEL 4

36

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

42

48%

LEVEL 4

26

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

36

41%

LEVEL 4

44

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

53

51%

LEVEL 4

37

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

20

59%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

53

43%

LEVEL 4

58

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

74

53%

LEVEL 4

48

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

15

47%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

62

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

70

51%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

21

66%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

19

56%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

128
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

62

43%

LEVEL 4

66

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

87

52%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.