MOUNT EDEN CHILDREN'S ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

39

45%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

15

37%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.