BRONX PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

35

53%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

33

54%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

37

70%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.