Skip to Content
Main content

EVERGREEN MS-URBAN EXPLORATION GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

133

42%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

58

40%

LEVEL 2

68

47%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

119

47%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

43

67%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

121

45%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

43

81%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

11

65%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

124

43%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

95

35%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

26

52%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.