Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACAD CS-PROSPECT HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

34

13%

LEVEL 3

135

51%

LEVEL 4

97

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

43

12%

LEVEL 3

154

44%

LEVEL 4

149

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

79

51%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

100

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

56

51%

LEVEL 4

36

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

65

45%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

183
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

112

54%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

199
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

116

49%

LEVEL 4

83

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

46

56%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

115

50%

LEVEL 4

93

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

131

44%

LEVEL 4

137

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

20

56%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

29

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

47

42%

LEVEL 4

54

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

109

54%

LEVEL 4

68

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

107

45%

LEVEL 4

95

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

219
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

129

51%

LEVEL 4

90

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.