Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 3 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

137

59%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

46

13%

LEVEL 3

189

54%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

54

53%

LEVEL 4

41

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

88

54%

LEVEL 4

57

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

83

63%

LEVEL 4

37

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

101

55%

LEVEL 4

45

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

109
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

68

58%

LEVEL 4

41

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

158
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

98

51%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

66

62%

LEVEL 4

34

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

123
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

85

60%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

116

57%

LEVEL 4

75

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

165

55%

LEVEL 4

100

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

21

72%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

24

49%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

128

57%

LEVEL 4

78

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

9

90%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

18

56%

LEVEL 4

12

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

33

56%

LEVEL 4

20

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

119

59%

LEVEL 4

66

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

156

54%

LEVEL 4

82

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

111

56%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

26

72%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.