Skip to Content
Main content

GREAT OAKS KATHLEEN SHERRY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

90

37%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

41

36%

LEVEL 2

52

46%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

55

41%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

26

48%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

33

44%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

49

34%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

31

49%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

55

34%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.