Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL VALLEY CSD AT ILION-MOHAWK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

236

31%

LEVEL 2

237

31%

LEVEL 3

206

27%

LEVEL 4

78

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 954

LEVEL 1

348

36%

LEVEL 2

294

31%

LEVEL 3

227

24%

LEVEL 4

85

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

145

31%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

130

35%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

203

42%

LEVEL 2

144

30%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

272
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

213

30%

LEVEL 2

219

31%

LEVEL 3

196

28%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

301
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 898

LEVEL 1

324

36%

LEVEL 2

273

30%

LEVEL 3

216

24%

LEVEL 4

85

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

150

23%

LEVEL 2

211

33%

LEVEL 3

203

32%

LEVEL 4

78

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

219

28%

LEVEL 2

251

32%

LEVEL 3

223

29%

LEVEL 4

85

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

86

75%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

129

73%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

284
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

231

31%

LEVEL 2

236

31%

LEVEL 3

206

27%

LEVEL 4

78

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

186

38%

LEVEL 2

154

31%

LEVEL 3

110

22%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

267

46%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

310
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 946

LEVEL 1

343

36%

LEVEL 2

293

31%

LEVEL 3

225

24%

LEVEL 4

85

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.