JACK ABRAMS STEM MAGNET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

133

34%

LEVEL 2

76

20%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

81

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

87

39%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

38

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

22

55%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

88

50%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

81

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

58

82%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

42

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

50

40%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

109

53%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

129

34%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

81

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.